彩神大发 - -（中国）百科词条

来源：彩神大发0265-01-20 17:48

彩神大发

【学习贯彻党的二十大】万钢：发挥特色优势，砥砺致力为公、侨海报国的时代担当******

　　连日来，各民主党派、工商联和无党派人士高度关注、持续热议中共二十大，认真学习贯彻二十大精神。大家纷纷表示，要紧紧围绕中共二十大绘制的宏伟蓝图、确立的奋斗目标和作出的战略部署，切实履行好参政党职能，主动参与全过程人民民主实践，在以中国式现代化全面推进中华民族伟大复兴的新征程上作出新贡献。即日起，“统战新语”陆续刊发各民主党派中央主席、全国工商联主席和无党派人士代表的学习心声。

　　中共二十大作出的各项决策部署、取得的各项成果，致公党中央倍感振奋，坚决拥护。学习宣传贯彻中共二十大精神是致公党当前和今后一个时期的重大政治任务。我们将广泛深入开展宣传宣讲和学习贯彻，切实把思想和行动统一到中共二十大精神上来。

　　坚定不移在思想上政治上行动上同以习近平同志为核心的中共中央保持高度一致

　　过去五年和新时代以来的十年中，以习近平同志为核心的中共中央统筹中华民族伟大复兴战略全局和世界百年未有之大变局，团结带领全党全国各族人民创造了新时代中国特色社会主义的伟大成就，推动我国迈上了全面建设社会主义现代化国家新征程。我们将引导全体致公党员深刻领悟“两个确立”决定性意义，增强“四个意识”、坚定“四个自信”、做到“两个维护”，做习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想的坚定信仰者、忠实实践者。

　　以高质量参政履职为全面建设社会主义现代化国家贡献力量

　　中共二十大把团结带领全国各族人民全面建成社会主义现代化强国、实现第二个百年奋斗目标，以中国式现代化全面推进中华民族伟大复兴作为中国共产党从现在起的中心任务。致公党将积极投入到这个中心任务中去。一是深入学习，牢牢把握习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想的世界观和方法论，为推进我国社会主义现代化建设建言献策。二是务必谦虚谨慎、艰苦奋斗，坚定历史自信，增强历史主动，把贯彻中共二十大精神体现到谋划工作、部署任务、推进实践中。

　　更好发挥致公党特色优势，砥砺致力为公、侨海报国的时代担当

　　中共二十大报告强调要加强海内外中华儿女大团结，形成同心共圆中国梦的强大合力。作为具有侨海特色的参政党，致公党有责任和义务为此作出新贡献。一是在向海外宣传好、解释好中共二十大精神上下功夫，进一步用好海外侨胞融通中外的独特优势以及海外华侨华人社团组织的宝贵资源，向他们讲好新时代新征程故事，讲好中国式现代化，更好地凝聚共识，增进团结。二是在做好海外统战工作上下功夫，增强忧患意识和底线思维，在积极应变的基础上，敢于斗争、善于斗争，更加注重涵养和保护侨界有生力量，更加注重服务国家外交大局，扩大对未建交和新建交国家侨胞的交流与合作，为营造我国发展良好国际氛围作贡献。我们将更加紧密地团结在以习近平同志为核心的中共中央周围，为全面建设社会主义现代化国家、全面推进中华民族伟大复兴贡献力量！

　　(来源：统战新语微信公众号作者万钢系致公党中央主席)

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.